Global Networks and Local Values
Publications
 |
Global Networks and Local Values: A Comparative Look at Germany and the United States This report focuses on the relationship between global information networks and local values (political, economic, and cultural norms). The book is structured around a comparison between U.S. and German approaches toward global communication and information flow. (The U.S. and Germany are selected as two industrialized, highly networked countries with significant social differences.) Highlighting specific issues such as taxation, privacy, free speech, and more, this thoughtful volume will be of interest to everyone concerned about the social implications of the global Internet. (December 2001) |
Project Scope Opportunities and risks are twins. There are few who would deny the opportunities provided by global networks in general and the Internet in particular. But many fear the concomitant risks, or what they perceive as risks. Racist speech, pornography, and misuse of personal data rank highest in public awareness. Some concerns are almost universal, such as child pornography. With respect to others there are at least differences of degree. In the light of its history, Germany has actually banned right-wing publications that would be allowed, even if not admired, in the United States. On the other hand, Americans in large numbers deem material pornographic which most Germans would find inoffensive. Privacy is also interpreted in different ways in these two societies. These contrasts lead some to a stark and simplistic assertion: global networks threaten local values. The reality of global networks, and of their interrelation with local values, is much more complex.
Working with a German partner institution (the Max Planck Institute for the Law of Non-Private Goods), the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) of the National Research Council (NRC) will convene two international symposia of invited U.S., German, and other experts in telecommunications technology and policy, including academic, industrial, and government leaders, to discuss the tensions between (a) the global expansion of the Internet and other communications networks and services that traverse borders seamlessly and in many ways uncontrollably, and (b) the desires of nations and communities to protect indigenous values through policies that apply within their borders. A steering committee consisting of participants named by the NRC and the German partner institution will oversee invitations to symposium participants and produce a final report that includes guidelines and recommendations for U.S. and German governments to cope with policy issues in this area.
Committee Members
|
Dr. Kenneth H. Keller (U.S. Chair) Professor of Science & Technology Policy Hubert H Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs University of Minnesota
Prof. Dr. Christoph Engel (German Chair) Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinschaftsgüter
Mr. Kenneth Dam (US) Professor University of Chicago Law School
Dr. Paul A. David (US) Senior Research Fellow All Souls College Oxford University
Prof. Dr. Dr. Klaus W. Grewlich (Germany)
Prof. Dr. Bernd Holznagel Westfälische Wilhelms-Universitaet Institut für Informations-, Telekommunikations- und Medienrecht
Professor Kenneth Keniston (US) Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Dr. Henry H. Perritt, Jr. (US) Dean & Professor of Law Chicago-Kent College of Law Illinois Institute of Technology
Papers from First Symposium
Papers from Second Symposium
Staff
Herb Lin, Senior Scientist (Study Director) Marjory S. Blumenthal, Executive Director
|
Dr. Robert Spinrad (US)
Dr. Raymund Werle (Germany) Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gesellschaftsforschung
Prof. Dr. Martina Zitterbart (Germany) Institut fuer Betriebssysteme und Rechnerverbund TU Braunschweig
German American Academic Council Staff, Deutsch-Amerikanisches Akademisches Konzil
Herrn Dr. Johannes Belz
German Staff, Max-Planck-Projektgruppe
Joachim Dölken
Anja Moosmann (assistant to Prof. Engel)
Dr. Lorenz Müller
Wolf Osthaus (Germany)
|
|