Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences The National Academies

NAS NAE IOM NRC November 7, 2009

DEPS Home
DEPS Committee
Publications
Standing Committees
Boards and Committees
Contact DEPs Staff
DEPS Reports In Action
Our Mission
DEPS FAQ
Upcoming Reports

Infrastructure

Reports and Summaries

   2009  2008 2007 2006 2005 2004

2009_evaluation_of_future_strategic
 
Released 7.30.2009
 
The U.S. Capitol Complex in Washington, D.C., comprises some of the most historic and symbolic buildings in the nation. The steam and chilled water required to heat and cool these buildings and related equipment is generated and distributed by the Capitol Power Plant (CPP) district energy system. Portions of the CPP system are now 50 to 100 years old and require renewal so that reliable utility services can be provided to the U.S. Capitol Complex for the foreseeable future. The report provides comments on an interim set of publicly available consultant-generated options for the delivery of utility services to the U.S. Capitol Complex. The report provides recommendations to bring the interim options to completion, including suggestions for additional analyses, so that the CPP can be best positioned to meet the future strategic and energy efficiency requirements of the U.S. Capitol Complex.
 
 
no_cover_image
 
Released 07.23.09
 
Construction productivity--how well, how quickly, and at what cost buildings and infrastructure can be constructed--directly affects prices for homes and consumer goods and the robustness of the national economy. Industry analysts differ on whether construction industry productivity is improving or declining. Still, advances in available and emerging technologies offer significant opportunities to improve construction efficiency substantially in the 21st century and to help meet other national challenges, such as environmental sustainability. Advancing the Competitiveness and Efficiency of the U.S. Construction Industry identifies five interrelated activities that could significantly improve the quality, timeliness, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability of construction projects.  These activities include widespread deployment and use of interoperable technology applications; improved job-site efficiency through more effective interfacing of people, processes, materials, equipment, and information; greater use of prefabrication, preassembly, modularization, and off-site fabrication techniques and processes; innovative, widespread use of demonstration installations; and effective performance measurement to drive efficiency and support innovation. The book recommends that the National Institute of Standards and Technology work with industry leaders to develop a collaborative strategy to fully implement and deploy the five activities.
 
 2009_assess_corrosion_education
 
Corrosion in the broadest sense is the degradation and loss of function of materials by their exposure to the operational environment. Corrosion has a great impact on the safety and reliability of a wide range of engineered products and its cost to the economy is substantial. While efforts to apply corrosion understanding have saved billions of dollars, it is clear that much more can be done to better understand corrosion and mitigate its effects. To assist in this effort, Congress directed DOD to request an NRC study to assess the level and effectiveness of corrosion engineering education in the United States and to provide recommended actions to enhance corrosion-based skills and knowledge. This report provides an examination of the importance of corrosion engineering education; an assessment of corrosion education; and a series of conclusions about and recommendations for improving corrosion education.
 
 

Review of the Bureau of Reclamation’s Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe (NMAB)

Released 01.30.09

Ductile iron pipe (DIP) is commonly used for water transmission and distribution.  In particular, the Bureau of Reclamation makes extensive use of DIP for its large water projects in the Western United States.  As with all pipe materials, DIP is subject to corrosion, the rate of which depends on the characteristics of the soil in which it is placed.  The Bureau has determined corrosion protection requirements for the pipe it uses.  For the most corrosive soil, the most recent requirements issued by the Bureau (2004) have become rather controversial.  The manufacturers of DIP argue the protection required in this case is too stringent, costly, and difficult to apply.  To attempt to resolve this controversy, the Bureau asked the NRC to study the issue and make recommendations about corrosion protection for DIP in highly corrosive soils.  This report presents an overview of DIP and corrosion; an assessment of case histories and data about DIP corrosion performance; an analysis of pipeline failure criteria; an evaluation of corrosion control alternatives; and findings and recommendations.

 

  
Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement