Collaborative Website to Improve Postdoctoral Training
On February 25, 2015, the Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP) convened a small workshop of leaders of federal research agencies, universities, professional societies, and the postdoctoral community to discuss how to collaboratively to improve postdoctoral training.
While COSEPUP’s 2014 report The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited formed a foundation, the purpose of the meeting was not to lecture about the report. Rather, it was an interactive meeting at which everyone shared their experiences, their failures and successes, and their suggestions for future actions.
We learned about activities that have already been launched, gained insights into best practices, and built a further understanding of the many barriers that must be overcome.
One of those barriers was the lack of central repository to find information about events, research, and data sources. This site was suggested to try and partially address that barrier.
- A member of The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited authoring committee, Paula Stephan, hosted a Webinar with the National Academies' Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR):
- On March 6, 2015, GUIRR hosted a webinar on this newly released NRC report. The presentation first summarized general facts regarding postdoctoral fellows, including the large and growing population of postdoctoral researchers, the spread of postdoctoral positions from physical and biomedical sciences to other fields such as engineering, the humanities and social sciences, the relatively low pay postdoctoral fellows receive and the fact that many postdoctoral fellows end up working in non-research positions. The data come primarily from the Survey of Earned Doctorates, the Survey of Doctorate Recipients and the Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering. The presentation also discussed the six main recommendations made by the committee, the types of actions required to implement them, and, especially with regard to the recommendation regarding compensation, the rationale for the recommendation. The six relate to (1) period of service, (2) title, (3) career development, (4) compensation, (5) mentoring, and (6) data collection.
- Evening of May 3 through May 5, 2015: The Rackham Graduate School of The University of Michigan is hosting “a national meeting that seeks to bring together a broad group of stakeholders, including representatives of academic institutions, funding agencies, trainees, scientific societies and other interested individuals, to discuss possible solutions to the career imbalances that have developed in the biomedical workforce” entitled the Future of Bioscience Graduate and Postdoctoral Training.
- Kenny Gibbs and Kim Griffin:
- Kim Griffin (Mentoring Research):
Related National Academies reports
- Sigma Xi’s Doctors without Orders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Science Foundation
If you have other resources or learn of upcoming events you would like to share with the community, please send a email to cosepup with the subject line "Postdoctoral Website Information."