Past Reports A Guide to the Methodology of the National Research Council Assessment of Doctorate Programs (prepublication release: July 2009)
Read online free Buy the book
This report describes the purpose, data and methods used to calculate ranges or rankings for research-doctorate programs that participated in the NRC Assessment of Research-Doctorate programs. It is intended for those at universities who will have to explain the NRC Assessment to others at their university, to potential students, and to the press. Although the main text is fairly non-technical, it includes a technical description of the statistical methods used to derive rankings of over 5000 doctoral programs in 61 fields. (Board on Higher Education and Workforce (BHEW))
Assessing Research-Doctorate Programs: A Methodology Study (2003)
Read online free Buy the book
How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctoral program assessment which will be useful to administrators, faculty, and others with an interest in improving the education of Ph.D.s in the United States. It reviews the methodology of the 1995 NRC rankings and recommends changes, including the collection of new data about Ph.D. students, additional data about faculty, and new techniques to present data on the qualitative assessment of doctoral program reputation. It also recommends revision of the taxonomy of fields from that used in the 1995 rankings. (Board on Higher Education and Workforce (BHEW))
Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change (1995)
Buy the book
Doctoral programs at U.S. universities play a critical role in the development of human resources both in the United States and abroad. This volume reports the results of an extensive study of U.S. research-doctorate programs in five broad fields: physical sciences and mathematics, engineering, social and behavioral sciences, biological sciences, and the humanities. This report documents changes that have taken place in the size, structure, and quality of doctoral education since the widely used 1982 editions. This update provides selected information on nearly 4,000 doctoral programs in 41 subdisciplines at 274 doctorate-granting institutions. Get more information on past reports
Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Committee Chair Professor of Astronomy, Department of Astrophysical Sciences Princeton University, NJ Virginia S. Hinshaw, Vice-Chair Chancellor University of Hawaii at Manoa Elton D. Aberle Dean and Director Emeritus, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison
Norman Bradburn Tiffany and Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus University of Chicago John I. Brauman J.G. Jackson - C.J. Wood Professor of Chemistry, Emeritus Stanford University
Jonathan R. Cole (resigned May 2010) John Mitchell Mason Professor of the University Columbia University Paul W. Holland Frederic M. Lord Chair in Measurement and Statistics (retired) Educational Testing Service
Eric W. Kaler Provost and Senior Vice President Stony Brook University Earl Lewis Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Emory University
Joan F. Lorden Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Carol B. Lynch Dean Emerita of the Graduate School University of Colorado, Boulder Robert M. Nerem Parker H. Petit Professor and Director, Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience Georgia Institute of Technology Suzanne Ortega University Professor and Dean Emerita University of New Mexico Catharine R. Stimpson Dean and University Professor, Graduate School of Arts and Science New York University Richard P. Wheeler Vice Provost University of Illinois
|