ASEB The National Academies

NAS NAE IOM NRC November 22, 2009



ASEB Home
About Us
Board Members
Staff
Publications
Newsletter
Related Links
Contact Us
DEPS Home

Welcome to the home page of the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board (ASEB). The ASEB provides an independent, authoritative forum for space engineering and aeronautics research within the National Research Council the operating arm of The National Academies.

 

News and Events

Job Opening Announcement for Senior Board Director.

October 26-28, 2009
Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space: Animal and Human Biology Panel

October 28-30, 2009
Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space: Integrative and Translational Research for the Human Systems in Space Panel

November 4-6, 2009
Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space: Applied Physical Sciences Panel

November 9-10, 2009
Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space: Fundamental Physical Sciences Panel

View More News and Events Click Here

 
 

Studies in Progress

Committee for the Review of NASA’s Aviation Safety Related Programs

The National Research Council’s Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, in conjunction with the Transportation Research Board, will establish an ad hoc study committee to conduct an independent review of NASA’s aviation safety-related research programs. The review shall assess whether the programs have well-defined, prioritized, and appropriate research objectives; The programs are properly coordinated with the safety research programs of the Federal Aviation Administration and other relevant federal agencies; The programs have allocated appropriate resources to each of the research objectives; and suitable mechanisms exist for transitioning the research results from the programs into operational technologies and procedures and certification activities in a timely manner.

Decadal Survey on Biological and Physical Sciences in Space

The National Research Council Space Studies Board, in cooperation with the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board will organize a decadal survey to establish priorities and provide recommendations for life and physical sciences research in microgravity and partial gravity for the 2010-2020 decade. The committee will develop criteria for the prioritization.  The decadal survey will define research areas, recommend a research portfolio and a timeline for conducting that research, identify facility and platform requirements as appropriate, provide rationales for suggested program elements, define dependencies between research objectives, identify terrestrial benefits, and specify whether the research product directly enables exploration or produces fundamental new knowledge. These areas will be categorized as either those that are required to enable exploration missions or those that are enabled or facilitated because of exploration missions

Review of Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies

The National Research Council Space Studies Board, in cooperation with the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, shall conduct a two-part study to address issues in the detection of potentially hazardous NEOs and approaches to mitigating identified hazards. Both tasks should include an assessment of the costs of various alternatives, using independent cost estimating. Options that blend the use of different facilities (ground- or space-based), or involve international cooperation, may be considered. Each study phase will result in a report to be delivered on the schedule provided in the contract. Key questions to be addressed during each phase of the study concern two areas: NEO Surveys and NEO Hazard Mitigation.

NEO Survey Panel
Review of Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies, Survey/Detection Panel

NEO Hazard Mitigation Panel
Review of Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies, Mitigation Panel

Rationale and Goals of the U.S. Civil Space Program

A committee will prepare a report to advise the nation on key goals and critical issues in 21st century U.S. civil space policy. The committee will identify overarching goals that are important for our national interest. Issues that are critically important to achieving these goals and ensuring the future progress of the U.S. civil space program will be identified, and options to address unresolved issues will be discussed. Using its best objective judgment and recognizing other national priorities, the committee will explore a possible long term future for U.S. civil space activities that is built upon lessons learned and past successes; is based on realistic expectations of future resources; and is credible scientifically, technically, and politically.

Radioisotope Power Systems Project

The Space Studies Board, in conjunction with the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, will appoint a study committee to assess the technical readiness and programmatic balance of NASA's radioisotope power systems technology portfolio in terms of its ability to support NASA’s near- and long-term mission plans. In addition, the study will also examine related public and private infrastructure and the effectiveness of other federal agencies involved in relevant R&D. The study will also review strategies for re-establishing domestic production of Pu-238, which serves as the fuel for radioisotope power systems.

NASA's National Aviation Operations Monitoring Service (NAOMS) Project: An Independent Assessment

The Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board, in conjunction with the Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, will create an ad hoc study committee to make an independent assessment of NASA's NAOMS project. This project used a survey methodology to anonymously collect data from commercial and general aviation pilots over several years regarding aviation safety-related events. The NAOMS project contracted with Battelle Memorial Institute to design the survey and collect the data. The committee will assess the NAOMS survey methodology, and, to the extent possible, analyze the survey data. Meeting Agendas and Presentations

Review of the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts

An ad hoc committee operating under the auspices of the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board will conduct a review to evaluate how well the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) developed revolutionary aeronautical and space concepts that could dramatically impact how NASA develops and conducts its mission. NASA funding for NIAC ended in 2007, and Congress has directed the NRC to review NIAC performance. The review will help guide NASA in assessing NIAC's processes and results and in shaping future efforts in this area.

 

Recent Reports

 no_cover_imageAn Assessment of NASA's National Aviation Operations Monitoring Service
2009_near_earth_object_surveys_interimNear-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies: Interim Report
2009_americas_future_in_spaceAmerica's Future in Space: Aligning the Civil Space Program with National Needs
 2009 Fostering VisionsFostering Visions for the Future: A Review of the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts
2009_radioisotope_power_systemsRadioisotope Power Systems: An Imperative for Maintaining U.S. Leadership in Space Exploration
A constrained TechnologyA Constrained Space Exploration Technology Program: A Review of NASA's Exploration Technology Development Program
2009 NASA Aeronautics ResearchNASA Aeronautics Research: An Assessment
2008_managing_space_radiationManaging Space Radiation Risk in the New Era of Space Exploration
 2009_assessing_research_and_developmentAssessing the Research and Development Plan for the Next Generation Air Transportation System: A Workshop
2008_wake_turbulence

Wake Turbulence: An Obstacle to Increased Air Traffic Capacity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Site managed by the ASEB WebTeam.
To comment on this Web page or report an error, please send feedback to the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board

Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement