July 5, 2008

DEPS Home
DEPS Committee
Publications
Podcasts
Standing Committees
Boards and Committees
Contact DEPs Staff
DEPS Reports In Action
Our Mission
DEPS FAQ
Upcoming Reports
Local Search

DEPS Reports in Action

DEPS reports make an impression and have real effect in the areas of Science and Technology-based Policy, Research and Development Program Assessments, Technology-based Program Assessments, as well legislative action at the federal, state and local government levels.

Science and Technology-based Policy

The following are reports released over the past two years have influenced the direction and implementation of science and technology-based public policy:

  • Avoiding Surprise in an Era of Global Technology Advances provides a methodology that 1) offered the prospect of a more disciplined intelligence community approach to technology warning considerations, and 2) established a foundation for an enduring NRC relationship with the Defense Intelligence Agency through the establishment of a standing committee and the development of follow-on studies.
  • C4ISR for Future Naval Strike Groups (2006) has drawn early praise for its description of a forward path for adapting future naval strike groups with evolving C4ISR capabilities and has been recommended for briefing to the Chief of Naval Operations.
  • IDs-Not That Easy (2002) and Who Goes There? (2003) formed the basis for testimony presented at a hearing of the Subcommittee on Social Security of the House Committee on Ways and Means. The hearing addressed expanding the use of the Social Security Number card and measures to prevent SSN card fraud.
  • Effects of Nuclear Earth-Penetrator and Other Weapons provided congressional staff with a clear picture of the likely consequences of using nuclear weapons to achieve the goal of destroying underground, hardened bunkers. The report was instrumental in congressional action to discontinue the program.

Back to top

Research and Development Program Assessments

Reports that influence R&D funding priorities and programs of selected Federal agencies:

  • Assessment of Department of Defense Basic Research (2005) shows that DOD basic research funding was appropriately applied by the department to perform fundamental research. The primary effect was that congressional staff on the Armed Services Committees now have evidence to dispute inaccurate and unfounded claims to the contrary.
  • Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE: A First Look Forward (2005) introduced much needed realism into the assessment of potential benefits of these programs and has influenced the Department of Energy's thinking on how to conduct realistic benefits evaluations. As part of its overall R&D portfolio development, DOE has an inter-laboratory working group that addresses benefits evaluation and the committee chair attends some of their meetings.
  • Decadal Survey of Civil Aeronautics - Foundation for the Future (2006) demonstrated that a target-rich environment exists for civil aeronautics research and technology (countering the mature technology argument) and prioritizes R&T using a quantitative basis for assigning priorities with the flexibility to adjust to future considerations.
  • Network Science for Future Army Applications (2005) will enable the Army to play a leading Department of Defense role in science and technology for network-centric warfare and operations. Based on the report the sponsor has invested $10 million in fiscal year 2007 and funding continues to rise in the out years.

Back to top

Technology-based Program Assessments

Reports that influenced the content and direction of technology-based programs at selected Federal agencies:

  • A Review of United States Air Force Aerospace Propulsion Needs provides a better mapping between the propulsion technology base programs and more clearly defined future needs. Continued uncertainties and resultant inefficiencies in an era of reduced funding for propulsion will produce less than optimum results without these programs.
  • The 2003-2004 Assessment of the Army Research Laboratory (2005), along with previous biennial assessments, form the basis of Army Research Laboratory Technical Assessment Board's assessment of the quality of its scientific and technical work, the extent to which the work is tailored to meet Army needs and R&D niches, and the contributions of ARL staff to the broader scientific community.
  • Monitoring at Chemical Agent Disposal Facilities (2005) caused the U.S. Army's Chemical Materials Agency to apply Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry as a real- time detection method for their field operation of both their non-stockpile and stockpile programs. This action will improve agent monitoring and warn of potential agent release.
  • System Integration for Project Constellation (2004) developed a process and a methodology for making significant programmatic decisions. We propose adapting this process and methodology to solve significant problems in the future.

Back to top

Copyright 2008. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. 500 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement