Contact Us  |  Search:  
 
Federal Demonstration Partner
Home Directory
Quick Links

login

        
                                                          
FDP Contacts

Mailing Address:

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001
Tel: (202)334-3994
Fax: (202)334-1369
E-mail:
fdp@nas.edu

FDP Brochure 2012

FDP Brochure 2016

 


Current FDP Projects

Troublesome Clauses System
Contracts Task Force

Alex McKeown, Johns Hopkins University

An online database where FDP members can enter and access information about terms & conditions placed in research grants and contracts that are difficult to accept. The database tracks the negotiation of the clause, the resolution and any alternate language that was agreed upon. FDP members can use this tool to see how specific agencies have negotiated specific clauses previously and use that information in their negotiations.

Click here to get more information.


 

Expanded Clearinghouse / Subrecipient Monitoring
Research Administration Committee

Pamela Webb, University of Minnesota
Lynette Arias, University of Washington
Jennifer Barron, John Hopkins University

The goal of the Expanded Clearinghouse/Subrecipient Monitoring Workgroup is to develop one single web based repository for all FDP entities (and potentially others) to enter, upload, maintain and update all entity related information about their organization. This centralized online repository of entity information can then be utilized to enable Pass-Through Entities to obtain and review all necessary subrecipient entity information and conduct subrecipient entity monitoring and risk assessment activities in a timely and streamlined fashion without requiring time and resources to send and collect various forms to obtain information. The workgroup has developed this clearinghouse to demonstrate how creating a “one-stop shop” for information needed to comply with Uniform Guidance Subrecipient Monitoring requirements is feasible, reduces administrative burden and supports the request for a Safe Harbor.

Click here to get more information.


 JAD Team
eRA Committee

Debbie Nixon, Duke University

The Joint Application Design (JAD) Team is a group of individuals with different roles in the grants application process that work with Grants.gov to address issues in the system and streamline the process of using Grants.gov to submit grant applications. They look at both the PDF forms submission process and the system-to-system submission process.


Digital Accountability and Transparency Act (DATA Act)
eRA Committee and Research Administration/Open Government Subcommittee

Richard Fenger, University of Washington
Bronda Harrison, Environmental Protection Agency
Jason Hitchcock, US Department of Agriculture
Mark Sweet, University of Wisconsin, Madison

The DATA Act Working Group is led by a combination of participants from the FDP Open Government Group (Richard Fenger) and the eRA Standing Committee (Bronda Harrison, Jason Hitchcock and Mark Sweet). The purpose of the working group is to monitor and engage in the activities of OMB and Department of Treasury as they implement the DATA Act. In addition, FDP will provide feedback, guidance, and offer testing/ validation assistance as the DATA ACT phases progress.


Streamlining Proposal Submissions
eRA Committee

Megan Columbus, National Institutes of Health
Tom Drinane, Dartmouth College
Debbi Nixon, Duke University
Lori Schultz, University of Arizona
Ron Splittgerber, Colorado State University

The goal of the Streamlining Proposal Submission group is to identify opportunities for improvement, propose strategies for mitigating/ resolving the pain points and work with the FDP eRA Committee, FDP member institutions and federal agencies to implement effective improvements.


21st Century Tools
eRA Committee

Andrew Gray, University of Alaska
Rebecca Puig, University of South Florida
Ron Splittgerber, Colorado State University

The 21st Century Tools group explores and pilots the use of collaboration tools to enhance and facilitate FDP’s communication and planning.


ScienCV
eRA Committee

Lori Ann M. Schultz, University of Arizona

In collaboration with NIH & NSF, the FDP is exploring how a central repository of researcher profiles might be implemented in the United States. They are looking at systems that have been implemented on other countries as well as gathering input from stakeholders in the community.


Family Worklife Balance Project
Faculty Committee

Michelle Masucci, Temple University

A collaboration with NIH & NSF, this project is looking into best practices, policies and guidance on a federal and institutional level to help researchers achieve a good balance between their home life and work life.


Faculty Workload Survey
Faculty Committee

Sandy Schneider, University of South Florida

The FDP completed its second Faculty Workload Survey in 2012, the results of which have been cited widely. A third survey is now in the preparation phase, with the goal of monitoring progress and honing in on areas with substantial potential for alleviating unnecessary administrative burden related to federally funded research projects.

Click here to get more information.


IRB Exempt Wizard
IRB Subcommittee

Jane McCutcheon, New Yourk University

The IRB Exempt Wizard is a proof of concept pilot that will allow investigators to enter information about the human subjects protocol into an online decision support system in order to determine if their protocol needs to be reviewed by a full IRB committee or if it exempt from such review.


IRB Practical Guide
IRB Subcommittee

Lois Brako, University of Michigan

The goal is to provide a set of tools that will allow institutions to reduce administrative burdens and maintain superior standards of human subject protection while adhering to federal regulations. These tools are based on the suggestions of our forward-thinking colleagues, particularly the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP), and on our own experiences with successful demonstration projects.

Click here to get more information.


Subaward Forms
Subaward Task Force

Amanda Hamaker, Purdue University
Amanda Humphrey, Harvard University
Stephanie Scott, Columbia University

The subaward form is an ongoing project that has produced several subaward templates for institutions to use when processing subawards. The objective of the project is the adoption of a common agreement that all parties can use without changing the language. This reduces the time needed to review each agreement and streamlines the subaward process. Additional model agreements have been developed for use with foreign subrecipients, clinical trials and with contract prime awards.

Click here to get more information.