Contact Us  |  Search  
 
The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine
Partnerships for Enhanced Engagement in Research
Development, Security, and Cooperation
Policy and Global Affairs
Home About Us For Grant Recipients Funded Projects Email Updates
PARTNERSHIPS FOR ENHANCED ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH (PEER)
Cycle 6 (2017 Deadline)


Community-based monitoring and management of Madagascar’s National Park protected areas

PI: Lalatiana Randriamiharisoa, r.5tio@yahoo.fr, Madagascar National Parks
U.S. Partner: Brett Scheffers, University of Florida
Project dates: December 2017 - December 2022


Project Overview

6-134_protected areas map6-134_Identification guide.jpg 
 6 protected areas chosen as study sites (left);   study guide to help local communities identify biodiversity (right). Photo credit: PI Lalatiana Randriamiharisoa 
Madagascar National Parks (MNP) has a mandate to manage and conserve its protected area network of more than 2 million hectares of land; therefore, MNP needs efficient ways to collect data to inform its management practices. However, the data collected so far are disparate and do not cover the diversity of ecosystems under the park system’s purview, a problem that might be rectified by tapping into the biodiversity knowledge of local communities and MNP rangers.

This PEER project focused on improving and streamlining MNP’s data collection process via integration of local communities. The project provided local communities the opportunity to participate in the conservation of their local protected areas and helped create a local economy tied to biodiversity monitoring, which creates value for biodiversity outside of traditional natural resource extraction and use. Six protected areas were selected as study sites to cover the diversity of ecosystems and wildlife present throughout Madagascar, as well as a climate gradient to assess possible impacts from the wettest to the driest regions.

This project tested whether local communities can collect data and take leadership and ownership over the management of their protected areas, built up capacity, and assessed the ability of the local community to effectively and accurately monitor biodiversity and ecological parameters by comparing results from the expert team and the community-based team. The PI and her colleagues leveraged local community group (CLP) participants identified by the MNP. At the end of the project, the CLP members had the opportunity to enhance their knowledge and community linkages through training by the PI and the wider research team. The project focused on the conservation impact of the project and the socioeconomic impact of the 65 communities involved.
 
 6-134 practical training6-134 Lalatiana showing transects 
 Local community training. Photo credit: Lalatiana RandriamiharisoaUSAID and NAS site visit in Toliara, Madagascar in May 2019: local community shows transects in the area. Photo credit: Lina Stankute-Alexander
 
Final Summary of Project Activities

The PEER team began by training CLP members, park rangers, and MNP staff on survey methods, identification of target taxonomic groups, basic principles of climate and climate change, and installation and monitoring of climate stations. The PI and her U.S. partner also installed two microweather stations at each site to help determine whether climate has had an impact on biodiversity. During the first data collections, student researchers followed and collected data alongside CLPs, in order to ensure that CLP practices and data recording were accurate. Once confirmed, CLPs independently collected data monthly for six months. Students from the University of Antananarivo also collected biodiversity data in the same sites as the local community for comparison purposes .

By comparing the species identified by local community members in the six protected areas, the researchers found that community members were able to perform about as well as experts. The results suggest that community members saw about as many species as experts (and on average, a bit more). However, experts saw higher per species abundance on average, in large part because they saw far more individuals of common species. The numbers of species encountered by the CLPs and experts were almost the same across the four protected areas. On predicted species accumulation, after 150 days of monitoring effort, community members reached a plateau of improvement. Overall, the project showed an improvement in the quality of data collected on biodiversity, both by the local communities and by the park officials. This improvement was partly due to access to the identification guides originally produced at the start of the project and partly thanks to enhanced data collection in the field made by the PEER team and their trainees during the project.

The biodiversity monitoring method for this project has been adopted by each park. The monthly rounds by local community members have led to a crackdown on unauthorized people roaming in the protected areas, which may have reduced the number of trees illegally cut. Participating local communities exchange visits in each protected area, which was notable as many people involved had never traveled before. The exchange visits strengthened collaboration between the CLPs and the MNP staff.

The concept of women working as part of the local park committee resulted in a heated discussion during one exchange, as Andohahela National Park has eight female participants. That surprised CLPs at other parks where women are not allowed to participate, and yet, based on women's effective participation in this project, it is evident they are all as capable to work in conservation as men. According to the PI Dr. Randriamiharisoa, the women have been even more effective than the men in raising awareness of the relevant issues. The CLPs received compensation for their participatory work, and for some their earnings became their monthly source of income. Some participating community members were able to increase their livestock or poultry and further their agricultural activities, others were able to buy household supplies, while others used the funds to send their children to school.

The PEER team created and hosted a new workshop on structuring and cleaning databases and data analysis that can serve as a new ecological training program. They presented their findings at the 2022 annual meeting of the Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation in Cartagena, Colombia, and were awarded a new $79,000 grant from the Foundation for Protected Areas of Madagascar (FAPBM) for a similar project focused on vegetation monitoring.

Publication

Fiona Price, Lalatiana Randriamiharisoa, and David H. Klinges. 2023. Enhancing demographic diversity of scientist-community collaborations improves wildlife monitoring in Madagascar. Biological Conservation 288: 110377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110377
 
 
6-134_Andohahela site visit_Brent 6-134 Site visit group pic
May 2019:  Local USAID Mission representative Daniel Whyner, USAID regional advisor Brent Wells, and NAS program officer Lina Stankute-Alexander visited in May 2019. The team visited MNP in Antananarivo to discuss project performance and challenges, followed by a site visit in South Madagascar in Andohahela National Park to meet the local community that is working on the project, to see the status of weather stations, and observe how the transects are set up.Site visit group photo (USAID and NAS representatives with PI Lalatiana and native community members participating in PEER project, May 2019). Photo credit: Lina Stankute-Alexander
6-134_lalatiana in FL6-135_lalatiana and lizard
In September 2019, PI Lalatiana visited her U.S. Partner Prof. Brett Scheffers and David Klinges in Florida in September 2019 for training on data collection and processing. PEER PI Lalatiana Randriamiharisoa showing Madagascar biodiversity. Photo credit: Lalatiana Randriamiharisoa































































Back to PEER Cycle 6 Grant Recipients