Policy and Global Affairs at The National Academies
The National Academies
The National Academies
Home
 
Quick Links

Did you know?

PGA is offering a selection of FREE reports to its website visitor.  Get your FREE report!

If you are from a developing country, you can download free PDFs of ALL Academy Reports.

You can learn about our international activities by downloading the brochure Science, Engineering, & Medicine: Working Toward a Better World (PDF 947 KB).


Fellowships
Predoctoral & Postdoctoral Opportunities
See which are right for you!

Contact Us
pga@nas.edu


Policy and Global Affairs
500 Fifth St. NW
Washington, DC 20001
(202) 334-2425

Science and Security: Reports

Science and Security: Related Items

Biosecurity at the National Academies

Board on Global Science and Technology (BGST)

Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC)

Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (CSTL)

Committee on Scientific Communication and National Security (CSCANS)

Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC)

 

Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction  (July 2009)
book icon
Read online free  page icon Download the report brief (PDF)  page icon Download the Russian version (PDF) sale icon Buy the book

Requested by Congress, this report recommends that the White House lead the reformulation of Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) programs as an active, coordinated tool of foreign policy, engaging departments across the government along with NGOs and international organizations. The Department of Defense CTR programs should participate in these efforts by expanding into new activities, partnerships, and geographic locations. Greater flexibility and authority should be provided to improve timeliness and effectiveness. Also, given a heightened focus on partnerships and relationship-building, CTR programs will need new ways to gauge the success of their projects.
(Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))


Countering Biological Threats: Challenges for the Department of Defense's Nonproliferation Program Beyond the Former Soviet Union (July 2009)
book icon Read online free
  page icon Download the report brief (PDF)  sale icon Buy the book

In response to a request from the U.S. Congress, this book examines how the unique experience and extensive capabilities of the Department of Defense (DOD) can be extended to reduce the threat of bioterrorism within developing countries outside the former Soviet Union (FSU). During the past 12 years, DOD has invested $800 million in reducing the risk from bioterrorism with roots in the states of the FSU. The program's accomplishments are many fold. The risk of bioterrorism in other countries is too great for DOD not to be among the leaders in addressing threats beyond the FSU. Taking into account possible sensitivities about a U.S. military presence, DOD should engage interested governments in about ten developing countries outside the FSU in biological threat reduction programs during the next five years. Whenever possible, DOD should partner with other organizations that have well established humanitarian reputations in the countries of interest. For example, the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the World Health Organization should be considered as potential partners.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

A Survey of Attitudes and Actions on Dual Use Research in the Life Sciences: A Collaborative Effort of the National Research Council and the American Association for the Advancement of Science (July 2009)
book icon Read online free
page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book

Over the last 50 years, rapidly expanding knowledge in the biological sciences has raised concerns over so-called "dual-use research," in which the same technologies that fuel scientific advances could also be misused to create biological weapons or for bioterrorism. Determining how to constrain these risks without slowing scientific progress is critical. The NRC conducted a survey with the American Association for the Advancement of Science to better understand life scientists’ attitudes about policies to address dual-use risks. The results suggest that there may be considerable support for approaches to oversight that rely on self-governance by the scientific community and that there is a need to clarify research activities of concern and provide guidance about what actions scientists can take to reduce risks. (with the Board on Life Sciences
 

Russian Views on Countering Terrorism During Eight Years of Dialogue: Extracts from Proceedings of Four Workshops (June 2009)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

Few countries have endured as many attacks of terrorism during the past two decades as has Russia. From bombings on the streets of a number of cities, to the disruption of pipelines in Dagestan, to the taking of hundreds of hostages at a cultural center in Moscow and at a school in Beslan, the Russian government has responded to many political and technical challenges to protect the population. The measures that have been undertaken to reduce vulnerabilities to terrorist attacks and to mitigate the consequences of attacks have been of widespread interest in many other countries as well.

In June 1999, the Presidents of the National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences initiated an inter-academy program to jointly address common interests in the field of counter-terrorism. Four workshops were held from 2001 to 2007 and additional consultations were undertaken prior to and after the series of workshops. This report includes 35 of the Russian presentations during the workshop series. Collectively they provide a broad overview of activities that have been supported by Russian institutions.  (Policy and Global Affairs (PGA))
 

The 2nd International Forum on Biosecurity: Summary of an International Meeting, Budapest, Hungary, March 30 to April 2, 2008  (May 2009)
book icon Read online free, page icon Download the report brief (PDF), sale icon Buy the book

The 2nd International Forum on Biosecurity, held in Budapest, Hungary on March 30 - April 2, 2008, represents the efforts of a number of individuals and organizations, over the last five years, to engage the international community of life scientists in addressing how to reduce the risk that the results of their work could be used for hostile purposes by terrorists and states. The participants who gathered in Budapest were already engaged in this challenging task, and, therefore, the focus of the meeting was on what had been accomplished and what challenges remained. There was no attempt to achieve consensus, since there exist real and important differences among those involved concerning the appropriate policies and actions to be undertaken. But there was a serious effort to identify a range of potential next steps, and also an effort to identify opportunities where international scientific organizations could make substantive contributions and offer their advice and expertise to policy discussions. The Forum's presentations, discussions, and results are summarized in this book. (Board on International Scientific Organizations (BISO))
 

Beyond 'Fortress America': National Security Controls on Science and Technology in a Globalized World  (April 2009)
book icon Read online free  page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book

The national security controls that regulate access to and export of science and technology are broken. As currently structured, many of these controls undermine our national and homeland security and stifle American engagement in the global economy, and in science and technology. These unintended consequences arise from policies that were crafted for an earlier era. In the name of maintaining superiority, the U.S. now runs the risk of becoming less secure, less competitive and less prosperous. This report provides an account of the costs associated with building walls that hamper our access to global science and technology, dampening our economic potential. It recommends ways to reform the export control process, ensure scientific and technological competitiveness, and improve the non-immigrant visa system that regulates entry into the United States of foreign science and engineering students, scholars, and professionals.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

Countering Terrorism: Biological Agents, Transportation Networks, and Energy Systems. Summary of a U.S.-Russian Workshop (March 2009)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

This book presents the proceedings of the fourth U.S.-Russian interacademy workshop on the general theme of countering terrorism, which was held in Moscow in March 2007. The fourth in a series, this volume continues to explore topics related to urban terrorism, but with a new emphasis on potential attacks involving biological agents, transportation networks, and energy systems.
  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

 

Cleaning Up Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Materials: International Workshop Proceedings (January 2009)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

This publication features papers presented at the Workshop on Cleaning Up Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Materials, held in Moscow in June 2007. This activity was organized by the National Academies in cooperation with the Russian Academy of Sciences and with funding provided by the Russell Family Foundation. The workshop was designed to promote exchanges of information on specific contaminated sites in Russia and elsewhere and to stimulate greater attention to the severity of the problems and the urgent need to clean up sites of concern to the local and international communities.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

  
Future of the Nuclear Security Environment in 2015: Proceedings  (January 2009)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

The U.S. National Academies (NAS) and the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), building on a foundation of years of interacademy cooperation, conducted a joint project to identify U.S. and Russian views on what the international nuclear security environment will be in 2015, what challenges may arise from that environment, and what options the U.S. and Russia have in partnering to address those challenges. The project’s discussions were developed and expanded upon during a two-day public workshop held at the International Atomic Energy Agency in November 2007. A key aspect of that partnership may be cooperation in third countries where both the U.S. and Russia can draw on their experiences over the last decade of non-proliferation cooperation. More broadly, the following issues analyzed over the course of this RAS-NAS project included: safety and security culture, materials protection, control and accounting (MPC&A) best practices, sustainability, nuclear forensics, public-private partnerships, and the expansion of nuclear energy. (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))

 

Internationalization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle: Goals, Strategies, and Challenges (January 2009)
book icon Read online free  sale icon Buy the book

The so-called nuclear renaissance has increased worldwide interest in nuclear power. This potential growth also has increased, in some quarters, concern that nonproliferation considerations are not being given sufficient attention. In particular, since introduction of many new power reactors will lead to requiring increased uranium enrichment services to provide the reactor fuel, the proliferation risk of adding enrichment facilities in countries that do not have them now led to proposals to provide the needed fuel without requiring indigenous enrichment facilities. Similar concerns exist for reprocessing facilities. Internationalization of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle summarizes key issues and analyses of the topic, offers some criteria for evaluating options, and makes findings and recommendations to help the United States, the Russian Federation, and the international community reduce proliferation and other risks, as nuclear power is used more widely. (with the Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board)

English-Chinese, Chinese-English Nuclear Security Glossary (2008)
book icon Read online free  page icon Download the report brief (PDF)  screen View the online version sale icon Buy the book

The U.S. National Academies Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC) and the Chinese Scientists Group on Arms Control (CSGAC) of the Chinese People’s Association for Peace and Disarmament have jointly produced a Chinese - English English - Chinese Nuclear Security Glossary. This glossary of approximately 1000 terms is built on 20 years of joint discussions on nuclear arms control, nuclear nonproliferation, nuclear energy, and regional security issues and is intended to remove barriers to progress in exchanges and diplomatic, cooperative, or other activities where unambiguous understanding is essential. (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))



Setting the Stage for International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facilities: International Workshop Proceedings (2008)
book icon Read online free  sale icon Buy the book

This publication is a collection of papers presented at the Workshop on Setting the Stage for International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facilities, held Vienna in June 2005, as well as a second session held in Washington, D.C., in October 2005. This activity was organized by the National Academies in cooperation with the Russian Academy of Sciences and with funding provided by the Russell Family Foundation. Papers included in these proceedings cover international monitoring at a proposed Russian spent fuel storage facility, transportation requirements, liability and insurance concerns, and the status of Russian legislation important in locating and operating such a facility.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

cover image

Science and Security in a Post 9/11 World: A Report Based on Regional Discussions Between the Science and Security Communities (2007)
book icon Read online free  sale icon Buy the book  audio Listen to the podcast

Based on a series of regional meetings on university campuses with officials from the national security community and academic research institutions, this report identifies specific actions that should be taken to maintain a thriving scientific research environment in an era of heightened security concerns. Actions include maintaining the open exchange of scientific information, fostering a productive environment for international scholars in the U.S., reexamining federal definitions of sensitive but unclassified research, and reviewing policies on deemed export controls. The federal government should establish a standing entity, preferably a Science and Security Commission, that would review policies regarding the exchange of information and the participation of foreign-born scientists and students in research. (Committee on Science, Technology, and Law (STL))
 

cover image

Science and Technology to Counter Terrorism: Proceedings of an Indo-U.S. Workshop (2007)
book icon Read online free, page iconDownload the report brief (PDF), sale icon Buy the book

This volume presents the papers and summarizes the discussions of a workshop held in Goa, India, in January 2004, organized by the Indian National Institute of Advanced Science (NIAS) and the U.S. Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC). During the workshop, Indian and U.S. experts examined the terrorist threat faced in both countries and elsewhere in the world, and explored opportunities for the U.S. and India to work together. Bringing together scientists and experts with common scientific and technical backgrounds from different cultures provided a unique opportunity to explore possible means of preventing or mitigating future terrorist attacks. (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC)) 

cover imageThe Biological Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense: From Foreign Assistance to Sustainable Partnerships  (2007)
book icon Read online free, sale icon Buy the book

This Congressionally-mandated report identifies areas for further cooperation with Russia and other states of the former Soviet Union under the Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program of the Department of Defense in the specific area of prevention of proliferation of biological weapons. The report reviews relevant U.S. government programs, and particularly the CTR program, and identifies approaches for overcoming obstacles to cooperation and for increasing the long-term impact of the program. It recommends strong support for continuation of the CTR program.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC)) 
 

cover imageU.S.-Russian Collaboration in Combating Radiological Terrorism (2007)
book icon Read online free, sale icon Buy the book

The International Atomic Energy Agency reports numerous incidents of illicit trafficking in radioactive materials, including ionizing radiation sources (IRSs) used in medical, agricultural, and industrial applications. This report assesses the threats posed by inadequately protected IRSs in Russia and recommends steps to enhance the effectiveness of DOE’s current cooperative program with Russia. These continuing DOE’s current program of quick security fixes and developing a comprehensive plan to work with Russian counterparts to reduce overall risk, within the context of a comprehensive Russian program for ensuring adequate life-cycle management of IRSs.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

 

cover imageCountering Urban Terrorism in Russia and the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop (2006)
book icon Read free online, page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book

In January-February 2005, the National Academies Committee on Counterterrorism Challenges for Russia and the United States and the Russian Academy of Sciences Standing Committee on Counterterrorism held a workshop on urban terrorism in Washington, D.C. Prior to the workshop, three working groups convened to focus on the topics of energy systems vulnerabilities, transportation systems vulnerabilities, and cyberterrorism issues. The working groups met with local experts and first responders, prepared reports, and presented their findings at the workshop. Other workshop papers focused on various organizations’ integrated response to acts of urban terrorism, recent acts of terrorism, radiological terrorism, biological terrorism, cyberterrorism, and the roots of terrorism.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

Related: Terrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings (2004), High-Impact Terrorism: Proceedings of a Russian-American Workshop (2002)

 
cover image
Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences (2006)
book icon Read free online, page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book
The risks posed by bioterrorism and the proliferation of biological weapons capabilities have increased concern about how the rapid advances in genetic engineering and biotechnology could enable the production of biological weapons with unique and unpredictable characteristics. This report examines current trends and future objectives of research in public health, life sciences, and biomedical science that contain applications relevant to developments in biological weapons 5 to 10 years into the future and ways to anticipate, identify and mitigate these dangers.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
 
 
 
cover imageLetter Report on the Threat Agent Detection Response System Database (2006)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

In the aim of combating the threat of bioterrorism and preventing the proliferation of biological weapons technology, pathogens, and expertise, the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency is implementing the Threat Agent Detection Response (TADR) Project in selected countries of the former Soviet Union. One aspect of TADR focuses on creating a network of infectious disease surveillance facilities to detect and respond to outbreaks in the host countries. This letter report by the Committee to Review Research Proposals from Former Soviet Biological Weapons Institutes addresses the question of which U.S. government organization should house the data repository for information collected under TADR. Also considered is the question of whether and how the U.S. government should provide this information to relevant international health organizations. 
(Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
 
cover imageReview of Research Proposals for Cooperation with Former Soviet Biological Weapons Personnel and Institutes: Letter Report from December 2, 2005 Review (2006)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

An ongoing committee of the National Research Council assists the Department of Defense in the development and implementation of a program of expanded scientific cooperation and exchange in peaceful applications of the biological sciences between American research scientists and Russian research scientists who had participated in the biological weapons program of the former Soviet Union. The committee reviews project proposals submitted to DOD by research scientists from Russia, suggests potential collaborators from the United States, and evaluates results of collaborative projects. This letter report provides the committee’s assessment of the proposals considered at its December 2, 2005, meeting.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
 
cover image An International Perspective on Advancing Technologies and Strategies for Managing Dual-Use Risks: Report of a Workshop (2005)
As part of a study of current and future research in the life sciences that contains applications relevant to development of agents of biological origin 5 to 10 years into the future, an NRC/IOM committee held an international workshop in 2004 to examine advancing technologies from a global point of view. Experts from different fields and from around the world presented their diverse outlooks on these technologies and forces that drive technological progress; local and regional capacities for life sciences research, development, and application (both beneficial and nefarious); national perceptions of the dual-use risk of advancing technologies; and strategic measures that have been taken or could be taken to manage the use of technology for malevolent purposes. This report summarizes the formal and informal discussions held at the workshop.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC)) 
 
 
cover imageAn International Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Facility -- Exploring a Russian Site as a Prototype: Proceedings of an International Workshop (2006)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

As part of a long-standing collaboration on nuclear nonproliferation, the National Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences held a joint workshop in Moscow in 2003 on the scientific aspects of an international radioactive disposal site in Russia. The passage of Russian laws permitting the importation and storage of high-level radioactive material (primarily spent nuclear fuel from reactors) has engendered interest from a number of foreign governments, including the U.S., in exploring the possibility of transferring material to Russia on a temporary or permanent basis. The workshop focused on the environmental aspects of the general location and characteristics of a possible storage site, transportation to and within the site, containers for transportation and storage, inventory and accountability, audits and inspections, and handling technologies. 
(Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
 
cover imageBiological Science and Biotechnology in Russia: Controlling Diseases and Enhancing Security (2005)
 book icon Read online freepage icon  Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book

In July 2005, the National Academies released the report Biological Science and Biotechnology in Russia: Controlling Diseases and Enhancing Security. The report offered a number of recommendations that could help restore Russia’s ability to join with the United States and the broader international community in leading an expanded global effort to control infectious diseases. A proposed bilateral intergovernmental commission could play a pivotal role toward that end as cooperation moves from assistance to partnership. The report proposed the establishment of two model State Sanitary Epidemiological Surveillance Centers in Russia, more focused support of competitively selected Russian research groups as centers of excellence, the promotion of investments in biotechnology niches that are well suited for Russian companies, and expanded opportunities for young scientists to achieve scientific leadership positions in Russia. Also, the report highlighted the importance of U.S. programs that support the integration of former Soviet defense scientists with civilian researchers who had not been involved in military-related activities.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
cover imageFrameworks for Higher Education in Homeland Security (2005)
 book icon Read online free, page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book
This report explores whether there are core pedagogical and skill-based homeland security program needs; examines current and proposed education programs focusing on various aspects of homeland security; comments on the possible parallels between homeland security, area studies, international relations, and science policy, as developed or emerging academic thrusts; and suggests potential curricula needs, particularly those that involve interdisciplinary aspects. The report concentrates almost exclusively on coursework-related offerings, primarily at the undergraduate and graduate levels. (Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR))

 
 
cover imageMonitoring Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear-Explosive Materials: An Assessment of Methods and Capabilities (2005)
 book icon Read online free, page icon  Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book
In this study, CISAC tackles the technical dimensions of a longstanding controversy: To what extent could existing and plausibly attainable measures for transparency and monitoring make possible the verification of all nuclear weapons—strategic and nonstrategic, deployed and nondeployed—plus the nuclear-explosive components and materials that are their essential ingredients? The committee’s assessment of the technical and organizational possibilities suggests a more optimistic conclusion than most of those concerned with these issues might have expected.  (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))



 
cover imagePartnering Against Terrorism: Summary of a Workshop (2005)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

Terrorism and the measures needed to prevent terrorist attacks pose a central policy challenge for the U.S. To meet this unprecedented challenge, the U.S. has great technological assets. What is needed are mechanisms to help the government draw on these strengths in a timely and effective fashion. To do so, the government needs to reach out to university researchers, national laboratories, small, high-tech businesses and leading corporations. One of the most effective ways to do this is through public-private partnerships. To link the lessons of the National Academies study on “Government-Industry Partnerships” to this critical national interest, the Academy organized a conference to bring the lessons of its analysis to bear on the war on terror. By encouraging policy attention to examples of effective public-private partnerships (in particular, the need for clear goals and regular assessments), this report contributes to a better understanding of the potential partnerships to bring new security-enhancing technologies and equipment to the market in a cost-effective and timely manner. (
Board on Science, Technology and Economic Policy (STEP))
 

cover imageProtection, Control, and Accounting of Nuclear Materials: International Challenges and National Programs -- Workshop Summary (2005)
book icon Read online free  sale icon Buy the book

The U.S. and Russian academies convened a workshop in 2003 for sharing best practices in nuclear materials protection, control, and accounting (MPC&A), including the status and application of remote monitoring technologies, personnel issues, and both national and international safeguards worldwide. The goals of the workshop were to identify areas in which the United States and Russia can promote best practices in MPC&A globally and expand U.S.-Russian cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation. The papers presented in the workshop and the outcomes of workshop discussions form the basis for this workshop summary.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))


 
 cover image
Review of Research Proposals for Cooperation with Former Soviet Biological Weapons Personnel and Institutes: Letter Report from 2000-2004 Reviews
(2005)
book icon Read online free sale iconBuy the book

An ongoing committee of the National Research Council assists the Department of Defense in the development and implementation of a program of expanded scientific cooperation and exchange in peaceful applications of the biological sciences between American research scientists and Russian research scientists who had participated in the biological weapons program of the former Soviet Union. The committee reviews project proposals submitted to DOD by research scientists from Russia, suggests potential collaborators from the United States, and evaluates results of collaborative projects. This report lists the proposals considered from 2000-2004 and summarizes the committee's recommendations.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

cover imageReview of Research Proposals for Cooperation with Former Soviet Biological Weapons Personnel and Institutes: Letter Report from June 27, 2005 Review (2005)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

An ongoing committee of the National Research Council assists the Department of Defense in the development and implementation of a program of expanded scientific cooperation and exchange in peaceful applications of the biological sciences between American research scientists and Russian research scientists who had participated in the biological weapons program of the former Soviet Union. The committee reviews project proposals submitted to DOD by research scientists from Russia, suggests potential collaborators from the United States, and evaluates results of collaborative projects. This letter report provides the committee’s assessment of the proposals considered at its June 27, 2005, meeting.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

 
cover imageStrengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia (2005)
In July 2005, the National Academies released the report Strengthening Long-term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. The report highlighted several obstacles in the transition from a U.S.-Russian cooperative program to a Russian-directed and Russian-funded fully indigenized program that will ensure the security of 600 tons of weapon-usable nuclear material at a level of international acceptability. Overcoming these obstacles requires an increased political commitment at a number of levels of the Russian Government to modern material protection, control, and accounting systems (MPC&A). Adequate resources must be provided to facilities where weapon-usable material is located for upgrading and maintaining MPC&A systems. Additionally, the technical security systems that are being installed through the cooperative program need to be fully embraced by Russian managers and specialists. The report recommends the establishment of a ten-year indigenization fund of about $500 million provided by Russia and its G-8 partners as a new mechanism for gradually shifting the financial burden of MPC&A to the Russian Government.   (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 
 
cover imageStrengthening U.S-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation (2005)
 book icon Read online freepage icon  Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book
Strengthening U.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation: Recommendations for Action offers the consensus findings and recommendations of a joint committee established by the U.S. National Academies and the Russian Academy of Sciences to identify methods of improving the ongoing cooperation between the two nations in this area. The report finds that the best way to realize the enormous potential of the U.S.-Russian relationship on nuclear nonproliferation is to reinvigorate the relationship between the two governments as a true partnership. It recommends that the U.S. and Russia establish a Joint High-Level Commission of government and non-government experts to assess their cooperation and devise a strategic plan for moving forward. It suggests that the Senior Interagency Group that was recently established by the two presidents be empowered to carry out this strategic plan. The report then examines three issue areas, making specific recommendations in each: law and taxation, program organization and management, and scientific and technical cooperation. (Policy and Global Affairs (PGA))

 
cover imageBiotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism (2004)
 book icon Read online freepage icon Download the report brief (PDF)| sale icon Buy the book

In recent years much has happened to justify an examination of biological research in light of national security concerns. The destructive application of biotechnology research includes activities such as spreading common pathogens or transforming them into even more lethal forms. Policymakers and the scientific community at large must put forth a vigorous and immediate response to this challenge. This new book by the National Research Council recommends that the government expand existing regulations and rely on self-governance by scientists rather than adopt intrusive new policies. One key recommendation of the report is that the government should not attempt to regulate scientific publishing but should trust scientists and journals to screen their papers for security risks, a task some journals have already taken up. With biological information and tools widely distributed, regulating only U.S. researchers would have little effect. A new International Forum on Biosecurity should encourage the adoption of similar measures around the world. Seven types of risky studies would require approval by the Institutional Biosafety Committees that already oversee recombinant DNA research at some 400 U.S. institutions. These “experiments of concern” include making an infectious agent more lethal and rendering vaccines powerless.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

 
cover imageOvercoming Impediments to U.S-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Non-Proliferation: Report of a Joint Workshop (2004)
 book icon Read online free, page icon Download the report brief (PDF) sale icon Buy the book
The U.S. National Academies and the Russian Academy of Sciences convened a joint workshop to identify methods of overcoming impediments to cooperation between the United States and Russia on nonproliferation. The workshop emphasized approaches and techniques that have already been shown to work in U.S.-Russian programs and that might be applied in other areas. The workshop was intended to facilitate frank discussion between individuals in the United States and Russia who have some responsibility for cooperative nonproliferation programs in the hope of identifying both the impediments to cooperation and potential methods of addressing them. This report summarizes the discussions at the workshop.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))  
 

cover imageTerrorism: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Improving Responses: U.S - Russian Workshop Proceedings (2004)
book icon Read online free, sale icon Buy the book
This report is devoted primarily to papers prepared by American and Russian specialists on cyberterrorism and urban terrorism. It also includes papers on biological and radiological terrorism from the American and Russian perspectives. Of particular interest are the discussions of the hostage situation at Dubrovko in Moscow, the damage inflicted in New York during the attacks on 9/11, and Russian priorities in addressing cyberterrorism.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

 
 

cover imageEnd Points for Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste in Russia and the United States(2003)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

This report provides an analysis of the management of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste in Russia and the United States, describing inventories, comparing approaches, and assessing the end-point options for storage and disposal of materials and wastes. The committee finds that despite differences in philosophy about nuclear fuel cycles, Russia and the United States need similar kinds of facilities and face similar challenges, although in Russia many of the problems are worse and funding is less available. The report contains recommendations for immediate and near-term actions, for example, protecting and stabilizing materials that are security and safety hazards, actions for the longer term, such as developing more interim storage capacity and studying effects of deep injection, and areas for collaboration.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

cover imageHigh-Impact Terrorism: Proceedings of a Russian-American Workshop (2002)
book icon Read online free sale iconBuy the book

In June 2001 the National Academies and the Russian Academy of Sciences held a bilateral workshop in Moscow on terrorism in a high--technology society and modern methods to prevent and respond to it. The purpose of the workshop was to begin a dialogue on high--impact terrorism that could lead to further U.S.--Russian collaboration. This volume includes papers presented at the workshop by 31 Russian and American experts on various types of high-impact terrorism, including biological and agricultural terrorism, nuclear and electromagnetic terrorism, explosives, chemical, and technological terrorism, and cyber terrorism. The papers also address legal issues, Russian internal affairs, and the future of international cooperation in this area.  (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))

 
cover imageSuccesses and Difficulties of Small Innovative Firms in Russian Nuclear Cities: Proceedings of a Russian-American Workshop (2002)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

This workshop report focuses on successes and failures of small innovative firms in five science cities in Russia. The workshop was organized by the NRC with the cooperation of Minatom. (Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 




cover imageTechnical Issues Related to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (2002)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

Drawing upon the considerable existing body of technical material related to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the National Academy of Sciences reviewed and assessed the key technical issues that arose during the Senate debate over treaty ratification. In particular, these include: (1) the capacity of the United States to maintain confidence in the safety and reliability of its nuclear stockpile in the absence of nuclear testing; (2) the nuclear-test detection capabilities of the international monitoring system (with and without augmentation by national systems and instrumentation in use for scientific purposes, and taking into account the possibilities for decoupling nuclear explosions from surrounding geologic media); and (3) the additions to their nuclear-weapons capabilities that other countries could achieve through nuclear testing at yield levels that might escape detection, and the effect of such additions on the security of the United States. (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))

 
cover imageA Comprehensive Nuclear Arms Reduction Regime: Interim Report (2001)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

The Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC) produced an interim report of a study on “A Comprehensive Nuclear Arms Reduction Regime.” The interim report outlines the first nine months of the study, primarily focusing on the technical aspects of a potential monitoring regime, including specific monitoring technologies. CISAC is reviewing draft materials that will be the basis for the final report.  (Committee on International Security and Arms Control (CISAC))

 
 
cover imageAlternative Technologies to Replace Antipersonnel Landmines (2001)
book icon Read online free sale icon Buy the book

This report examines potential technologies for replacing antipersonnel landmines by 2006, the target date the United States set in the late 1990s for signing an international treaty banning these weapons if suitable alternatives were available. Alternative Technologies to Replace Antipersonnel Landmines emphasizes the role that technology can play to allow certain weapons to be used more selectively, reducing the danger to uninvolved civilians while improving the effectiveness of the U.S. military. Landmines are an important weapon in the U.S. military’s arsenal but their indiscriminate nature poses risks to civilians and friendly forces. Some varieties remain active for many years, posing further risks of unintended casualties. New technologies could replace some, but not all, of the U.S. military’s antipersonnel landmines by 2006. In the period following 2006, emerging technologies might eliminate landmines totally, while retaining the necessary functions that current mines provide to the military. (
Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC))
 

 

Quick Links: Home  Newsletters  About Us  External Links
Program Units:
Cross Cutting Issues: